🔔 Late President Yar’Adua’s Daughter Forged Abuja Land Documents…FCT Minister Alleges

The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Mohammed Bello, on Tuesday told a High Court of the FCT that the daughter of former President Umaru Musa Yar’ Adua, Zainab, allegedly forged several documents to lay claim to ownership of a disputed plot of land in Abuja.

Bello said there was nothing to show that Zainab ever applied for land in the FCT or made any payment officially or otherwise to the Federal Capital Development Authority to enable her to be entitled to own any land in Abuja.

The Minister and the FCDA, in a joint statement of defence to a legal action filed by Zainab on the ownership of Plot 506, Zone B 09, Kado District, Abuja, denied ever allocating any plot of land to the plaintiff.

The PUNCH reported that the FCT minister and the FCDA were listed as 3rd and 4th defendants in the suit.

The defendants in their statement of defence dated September 21, 2021 and filed on their behalf by their lawyer, Yakubu Abubakar, informed the court that Zainab claimed ownership of the plot of the Abuja land through a Power of Attorney which the donor, Haliru Malami, later disowned as purported seller.

Zainab, through her company, Marumza Estate Development Company Limited, had dragged Itban Global Resources Limited, Haliru Malami, FCT minister and FCDA before a High Court of the FCT, laying claim to the ownership of Plot 506, Zone B 09, Kado District, Abuja, having allegedly purchased the land from the FCDA through Itban Global Resources and Malami.

But the defendants averred that before filing the court case, Zainab had allegedly given conflicting accounts of how the land was purportedly acquired through a former minister of the FCT as well as acquisition by way of purchase from the 1st defendant.

They stated that the 1st defendant, who allegedly sold the land, issued a letter on March 4, 2021, denying ever selling the land and ever issuing Power of Attorney to the plaintiff.

The 3rd and 4th defendants further claimed that upon the discovery that the plaintiff was laying claim to the plot of land through irregular documents, they voided and set aside a Certificate of Occupancy purportedly obtained from FCDA